Republish this article

Judge Strikes Down New York Jail’s Prolonged COVID Visitation Ban

Story and multimedia republishing rules

All our stories are published under Creative Commons, meaning that you are free to copy and distribute in your publication.
You may edit material to reflect relative changes in time, location and in-house style (for example, changing “yesterday” to “last week.”) If you’d like to make more substantive edits, like condensing stories, please run them by alex@nysfocus.com before publishing.
Bylines should credit New York Focus, in this format: “By [name of reporter], New York Focus”
Include the following language at the top of the story, with a link to our newsletter:

This story originally appeared in New York Focus, a nonprofit news publication investigating power in New York. Sign up for their newsletter here.

Please link back to our original story in the attribution line as well and include all hyperlinks from the original piece in the republished version.
If you share the story on social media, please mention @nysfocus (Twitter/X, Bluesky, Threads, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok).
Don’t sell the story or any part of it — it may not be marketed as a product.
Don’t extract, store or resell New York Focus content as a database.
Don’t sell ads against the story. But you can publish it with pre-sold ads.
Your website must include a prominent way to contact you.
You must obtain permission to package additional elements with our story and must label them.
You can republish our photos, illustrations, graphics and multimedia elements, but only with stories with which they originally appeared. You may not separate multimedia elements for standalone use. If you’re having trouble accessing visual elements, let us know.
If we send you a request to change or remove New York Focus content from your site, you must do so immediately.

For questions regarding the New York Focus publishing rules, or if you are a journalist or news organization that wants to join our partner list, please contact Alex Arriaga, Audience Engagement Editor, at alex@nysfocus.com.

This story originally appeared in <a href="https://nysfocus.com/2022/08/18/judge-strikes-down-broome-county-jail-prolonged-covid-visitation-ban">New York Focus</a>, a nonprofit news publication investigating power in New York. <a href="https://nysfocus.com/newsletter?utm_source=partner&utm_medium=website" target="_blank">Sign up for their newsletter here</a>.<hr>CRIMINAL JUSTICE · August 18, 2022
<h1>Judge Strikes Down New York Jail's Prolonged COVID Visitation Ban</h1>
<h2>The ban had helped the local sheriff rake in hundreds of thousands of dollars in profit from detainee video and phone call fees.</h2>
<h3>By <a class="yellow-underline" href="https://nysfocus.com/author/elizabeth-weill-greenberg">Elizabeth Weill-Greenberg</a> , New York Focus</h3><figure><img src="https://imgproxy.gridwork.co/8TdMyLCWVEA0cBR3Vl6IIAxcXxR7bM2abcZdub8aVNU/w:820/h:546/rt:fill/g:fp:0.5:0.5/q:90/el:1/aHR0cHM6Ly9zMy51cy1lYXN0LTIuYW1hem9uYXdzLmNvbS9ueXNmb2N1cy9Qcmlzb24tUGhvbmUtQ2FsbC1zY2FsZWQuanBn.jpg" alt="" /><figcaption>Between January and October 2021, the Broome County Sheriffs department took in more than half a million dollars from detainee phone calls and tablet use. / Jason Farrar</figcaption></figure><div>This article was published in partnership with <a href="https://theappeal.org/broome-county-jail-new-york-covid-visitation-ban/">The Appeal</a>. 
The Broome County Supreme Court on Thursday struck down the county jail’s ban on in-person visitation, which had been in effect for more than two years. The ban left detainees to rely on costly video and phone calls in lieu of face-to-face visits, generating hundreds of thousands of dollars for the sheriff’s department, The Appeal and New York Focus <a href="https://nysfocus.com/2022/06/14/broome-county-jail-visitation-ban-phone-calls-profits/">reported</a> in June.  
In May, Justice and Unity for the Southern Tier, a local nonprofit, filed a class-action suit arguing that the jail’s visitation ban violated the due-process rights of detainees. The policy—which the sheriff’s department defended as a COVID-19 mitigation measure—subjected detainees to “excessive costs and fees” that made communication “effectively unavailable” for many of the people held at the jail, <a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1hEFiN6ne1DwwWvnHTRyS0HL41AhGeVYg/view?usp=sharing">the suit charged</a>. 
In a <a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/22140104-decision-on-pi-just-v-harder">ruling</a> authored by Sixth Judicial District Justice Oliver N. Blaise, III, the court found "irreparable harm will result if in-person visitation for pre-trial detainees and visitors at the Jail is not resumed promptly with adequate safety protocols." 
The Broome County Sheriff’s Department had argued that the visitation ban would minimize exposure to COVID-19, and had noted that incarcerated people could still communicate with their families using jail tablets. 
Under the terms of the injunction, Broome County Jail must resume visitation by Sept. 5, with protocols that are “the least restrictive means given the circumstances,” Blaise wrote. The details of the reopening plan remain to be seen. 
Last month, the judge requested visitation proposals from the plaintiffs and the defense. The <a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ZbXBKz6vMjYQiWgv1jjS3cdBhzEHiAEp/view?usp=sharing">sheriff’s plan</a> would prohibit all physical contact and allow each detainee only 30 minutes of in-person visitation per week. His proposal would also require visitors to show proof of vaccination and present a negative COVID test administered within the previous seven days. 
Josh Cotter, an attorney with the nonprofit Legal Services of Central New York who filed the suit, said the sheriff’s plan would make visitation nearly impossible for many families. He noted that despite the sheriff's professed concern for protecting against the virus, the jail has not taken other common-sense steps to protect the health and safety of detained people: Those in the jail are tested for COVID only if they exhibit symptoms, and staff aren’t required to get vaccinated. 
In February, New York Focus <a href="https://nysfocus.com/2022/02/02/covid-testing-new-york-jails/">reported</a> that the Broome County Jail had one of the lowest testing rates of any jail in the state. Between <a href="https://scoc.ny.gov/pdfdocs/COVID-19%20Jail%20Status%20Report.pdf">Aug. 3 and Aug. 10</a>, Broome County jail only conducted three COVID-19 tests. 
With visitation closed at the Broome County jail, detained people have had to rely on expensive phone and video calls and electronic messaging to stay in touch with their loved ones. The sheriff’s department takes a cut of those communications fees, and the profits for the department have added up alongside the costs to detained people.   
Between January and October 2021, the Broome County Sheriff’s department took in more than half a million dollars from detainee phone calls and tablet use, according to <a href="http://www.justtalk.blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/FOIL-Martin-may-2022-posting.pdf">records</a> obtained by Justice and Unity for the Southern Tier (JUST), which runs a visitation program at the jail. JUST’s founding member Bill Martin first published the financial records on his blog, <a href="http://www.justtalk.blog/index.php/2022/06/03/broome-county-jails-secret-millions-profiting-from-covid-and-incarcerated-families/">Just Talk</a>. 
A 15-minute collect phone call to someone with a local area code can cost as much as $10, according to the complaint. Detained people receive just one free five-minute phone call per week. The cost of calls varies from jail to jail throughout New York, and <a href="https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/bills/2021/A3096">legislative efforts</a> to provide calls free of charge <a href="https://nysfocus.com/2021/10/14/free-phone-calls-jails-prisons/">have stalled</a>.  
At Broome County, video calls cost 25 cents a minute, according to a copy of the <a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1o8j8vNnaBHHOz1uuffclpjDbMsGfLDeU/view?usp=sharing">jail’s contract</a> with Global Tel Link, a telecommunications giant that operates in prisons and jails throughout the country. Each email sent on a tablet costs 25 cents, and each attached photo costs 50 cents. In most cases, it also costs 5 cents a minute just to use the tablet. Under the contract, the jail gets 44 percent of gross revenue generated from phone calls, 20 percent of gross revenue generated from video calls, and some tablet access charges. Each deposit into a detainee’s account for messaging and video calls also comes with a fee of $3.33.  
COVID-related visitation bans are still in effect at other New York jails, including those in <a href="https://www.alleganyco.gov/departments/sheriffs-office/jail/">Allegany County</a> and <a href="http://www.chemungsheriff.net/index.asp?pageId=266">Chemung County</a>, according to their respective websites. The jails did not return calls from New York Focus and The Appeal. Other facilities have implemented stringent new rules governing visits. Visitation resumed at <a href="https://www.cattco.org/sheriffs-office/visit-inmates">Cattaraugus County jail</a> this month, for example, but children are prohibited from touching their parents or moving much at all. “The child must sit in the chair, and stay seated during the visit,” the sheriff’s website reads. “Children are not allowed to stand, kneel, or lay on the chair.”  
Cotter said the court’s ruling could spur other New York jails to resume visitation more than two years after the start of the pandemic.  
“We hope [the lawsuit] sends a message to other jails who may be denying in-person visitation that what they're doing is not right,” Cotter said.</div>	 
<script src="https://nysfocus.com/pixel.js" id="republish" data-origin-url="https://nysfocus.com/2022/08/18/judge-strikes-down-broome-county-jail-prolonged-covid-visitation-ban"></script>