Republish this article

Hochul Wants More Police Surveillance. Legislators Want Boundaries.

Story and multimedia republishing rules

All our stories are published under Creative Commons, meaning that you are free to copy and distribute in your publication.
You may edit material to reflect relative changes in time, location and in-house style (for example, changing “yesterday” to “last week.”) If you’d like to make more substantive edits, like condensing stories, please run them by alex@nysfocus.com before publishing.
Bylines should credit New York Focus, in this format: “By [name of reporter], New York Focus”
Include the following language at the top of the story, with a link to our newsletter:

This story originally appeared in New York Focus, a nonprofit news publication investigating power in New York. Sign up for their newsletter here.

Please link back to our original story in the attribution line as well and include all hyperlinks from the original piece in the republished version.
If you share the story on social media, please mention @nysfocus (Twitter/X, Bluesky, Threads, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok).
Don’t sell the story or any part of it — it may not be marketed as a product.
Don’t extract, store or resell New York Focus content as a database.
Don’t sell ads against the story. But you can publish it with pre-sold ads.
Your website must include a prominent way to contact you.
You must obtain permission to package additional elements with our story and must label them.
You can republish our photos, illustrations, graphics and multimedia elements, but only with stories with which they originally appeared. You may not separate multimedia elements for standalone use. If you’re having trouble accessing visual elements, let us know.
If we send you a request to change or remove New York Focus content from your site, you must do so immediately.

For questions regarding the New York Focus publishing rules, or if you are a journalist or news organization that wants to join our partner list, please contact Alex Arriaga, Audience Engagement Editor, at alex@nysfocus.com.

This story originally appeared in <a href="https://nysfocus.com/2023/01/24/police-surveillance-boundaries-legislative-campaign">New York Focus</a>, a nonprofit news publication investigating power in New York. <a href="https://nysfocus.com/newsletter?utm_source=partner&utm_medium=website" target="_blank">Sign up for their newsletter here</a>.<hr>CRIMINAL JUSTICE · January 24, 2023
<h1>Hochul Wants More Police Surveillance. Legislators Want Boundaries.</h1>
<h2>Legislators are taking aim at a host of police surveillance tools, from undercover social media accounts to facial recognition to aerial drones.</h2>
<h3>By <a class="yellow-underline" href="https://nysfocus.com/author/chris-gelardi">Chris Gelardi</a> , New York Focus</h3><figure><img src="https://imgproxy.gridwork.co/sBFtt1b8A1a8Wcti0vytwuvaZ_NNSos1R9SSosmIkyo/w:820/h:463/rt:fill/g:fp:0.5:0.5/q:90/el:1/aHR0cHM6Ly9zMy51cy1lYXN0LTIuYW1hem9uYXdzLmNvbS9ueXNmb2N1cy9GbURQYXI0V1lBVTcyN3ctMS1lMTY3NDU3NTc2Mzg0MS5qcGc.jpg" alt="" /><figcaption>State lawmakers announced a package of bills to rein in police surveillance. / Surveillance Technology Oversight Project</figcaption></figure>	EARLIER THIS MONTH, more than a dozen New York state lawmakers and several watchdog organizations launched a years-in-the-making legislative campaign to rein in police surveillance. Attempting to catch up to what they describe as unchecked civil liberties violations by law enforcement, they announced plans to introduce 10 bills taking aim at a host of police surveillance tools, from undercover social media accounts to facial recognition to aerial drones.
“It’s long past time for New York to draw a line,” Albert Fox Cahn, executive director of the Surveillance Technology Oversight Project, said at the campaign’s onset, calling out “some of New York’s leaders” who are “excited to play big brother.” That was partially a reference to one of the legislative push’s biggest hurdles: Governor Kathy Hochul, who has sought to funnel more and more state resources into police intelligence and surveillance.
As New York Focus has reported, <a href="https://www.nysfocus.com/2022/03/29/kathy-hochul-budget-fusion-centers-crime-gun-intelligence-centers-police-surveillance/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Hochul slipped millions</a> of dollars into last year’s state budget to boost the New York State Police’s intelligence and surveillance capabilities, as well as those of the state’s little-known network of police intelligence hubs — both of which use technology and practices in the campaign’s crosshairs. The governor doubled down on those efforts throughout the year, funneling additional millions into <a href="https://www.timesunion.com/state/article/Hochul-looking-to-address-domestic-terrorism-gun-17181854.php" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">social media monitoring</a>, <a href="https://www.governor.ny.gov/news/governor-hochul-announces-50-million-public-safety-funding-2022-division-criminal-justice" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">license plate readers, drones, and more</a>. And this month, as <a href="https://www.governor.ny.gov/sites/default/files/2023-01/2023SOTSBook.pdf#page=68" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">part of her State of the State address</a>, she announced plans to boost police information-sharing and further expand the intelligence hubs. She’s cited gun violence and hate crimes as her main motivation.
“We’re watching you now, we know what you’re up to, and we’ll be coming after you,” <a href="https://www.governor.ny.gov/news/video-audio-photos-rush-transcript-governor-hochul-announces-support-comprehensive-package" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Hochul said</a> after a mass shooting in Buffalo in May.
The governor’s and legislators’ dueling priorities are setting up a showdown that could set the course for the future of police oversight in New York — and reverberate nationwide. Like most states, New York has almost no state-level privacy protections against prying government eyes. Some of the state laws currently acting as boundaries for police intelligence practices predate the internet.
“It’s a moving target,” said Senator Brad Hoylman-Sigal, who will introduce a bill to restrict the use of government DNA databases. “We need action at the legislative and executive levels.” 			<div class="flourish-embed flourish-cards" data-src="visualisation/12526788"><script src="https://public.flourish.studio/resources/embed.js"></script></div>
		
	THE LEGISLATORS HAVE aimed their campaign at some of the tools most ripe for police abuse.
One bill would ban law enforcement from monitoring social media using fake accounts, which cops have <a href="https://www.nysfocus.com/2022/06/13/fake-accounts-state-police-social-media-monitoring/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">used</a> to <a href="https://theintercept.com/2022/05/20/chicago-police-fbi-social-media-surveillance-fake/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">surveil and prosecute</a> racial justice protesters and <a href="https://mn.gov/mdhr/assets/Investigation%20into%20the%20City%20of%20Minneapolis%20and%20the%20Minneapolis%20Police%20Department_tcm1061-526417.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">attack critics</a>. Others would eliminate most government DNA databases across the state and prohibit the use of “phenotyping,” a scientifically contested practice through which authorities infer someone’s race by analyzing their DNA — as the New York City Police Department has done to profile <a href="https://www.thenation.com/article/society/chanel-lewis-karina-vetrano-nypd/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">hundreds</a> of Black men.
Another bill would ban most state agencies from collecting biometric data — for instance, with facial recognition algorithms, which can <a href="https://www.aclu.org/news/privacy-technology/a-scary-demonstration-of-what-unchecked-face-recognition-could-look-like" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">closely track</a> people’s whereabouts and which <a href="https://www.nist.gov/news-events/news/2019/12/nist-study-evaluates-effects-race-age-sex-face-recognition-software" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">misidentify</a> Black and Asian people many times more frequently than white people. Yet other legislation would restrict the deployment of police drones, which have been used to <a href="https://www.vox.com/recode/2020/5/29/21274828/drone-minneapolis-protests-predator-surveillance-police" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">monitor</a> and <a href="https://www.vice.com/en/article/jgxkm4/black-lives-matter-activist-nypd-drones-instagram-live" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">intimidate</a> activists; ban “cell site simulators,” which have been <a href="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/miami-dade.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">used against protesters</a> and can <a href="https://www.eff.org/pages/cell-site-simulatorsimsi-catchers" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">sweep up data</a> from thousands of phones within a geographic area; and prohibit surveillance of people’s internet use by their location and search history, a practice watchdogs warn prosecutors could use against <a href="https://www.vox.com/recode/23059057/privacy-abortion-phone-data-roe" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">people seeking abortion</a> in states where they’re newly illegal.
As Hochul expands state intelligence bodies absent greater regulation, they’ll likely have more to spend on these technologies.
Hochul has repeatedly increased the surveillance budget of the New York State Police — and specifically the State Police’s New York State Intelligence Center, or NYSIC, one of dozens of secretive and controversial <a href="https://theintercept.com/2020/07/15/blueleaks-anonymous-ddos-law-enforcement-hack/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">intelligence-sharing hubs</a> known as fusion centers created during the post-September 11, 2001 expansion in domestic surveillance. As New York Focus has reported, NYSIC <a href="https://www.nysfocus.com/2022/06/13/fake-accounts-state-police-social-media-monitoring/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">uses dummy accounts</a> to monitor social media. It also collects and maintains <a href="https://www.brennancenter.org/sites/default/files/analysis/NYSIC%20-%20Information%20and%20Intelligence%20Privacy%20Policy.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">biometric information</a>, including fingerprints, DNA, retinal scans, and <a href="https://www.syracuse.com/crime/2020/02/new-york-state-police-uses-controversial-facial-recognition-technology-that-just-had-its-data-breached.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">facial recognition data</a>, and has a <a href="https://www.nyclu.org/sites/default/files/NYSpolice_stingray_purchaserecords.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Stingray cell site simulator</a>, which accesses mobile data by masquerading as a cell tower and tricking phones into connecting with it. And the State Police have more active drone registrations — <a href="https://www.nyclu.org/en/campaigns/prying-eyes-government-drone-data-across-new-york-state" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">more than 120</a> — than any government agency in New York.
The New York State Police did not respond to questions about whether the department employs DNA phenotyping or monitors internet activity by location and search terms. Spokesperson Beau Duffy sent a <a href="https://www.nysfocus.com/2023/01/13/state-police-social-media-surveillance-including-dataminr-shadowdragon-geofeedia/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">generic statement</a> about investigative tools only being used by “specially trained” staff. Duffy declined to comment on the legislative campaign.
“The State Police is sensitive to privacy concerns and takes steps to protect personal information in accordance with the law,” Duffy said. “We follow all laws when gathering evidence to ensure anything relevant to a prosecution can withstand legal scrutiny and be used in court.”
In addition to the State Police, Hochul has also sought to expand New York’s Crime Analysis Center Network, a series of local intelligence-sharing hubs that resemble fusion centers. Last year, she nearly tripled state funding — adding $15 million — for the 10 existing crime analysis centers, and this year, she has <a href="https://www.governor.ny.gov/sites/default/files/2023-01/2023SOTSBook.pdf#page=78" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">proposed expanding</a> the network to include New York City.
Kirstan Conley, a spokesperson for the Department of Criminal Justice Services, which oversees the Crime Analysis Center Network, declined to comment on the legislative campaign and sent a lengthy statement asserting that “all work performed by [crime analysis center] staff is in response to requests from law enforcement agencies and connected to new or ongoing criminal investigations.” She did not answer repeated questions about location and keyword searches, fake social media accounts, and cell site simulators. 
According to DCJS, the crime analysis centers do not perform DNA analysis, but Conley said they do use facial recognition technology, license plate readers, and social media surveillance. 			<div class="flourish-embed flourish-cards" data-src="visualisation/12526970"><script src="https://public.flourish.studio/resources/embed.js"></script></div>
		
	THE ANTI-SURVEILLANCE campaign is broad, but with so much new surveillance tech on the market, it isn’t all-encompassing.
None of the 10 forthcoming bills address police use of automatic license plate readers, which are <a href="https://www.nyclu.org/en/automatic-license-plate-readers" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">prolific in New York</a> and can track the movements of virtually anyone with a car. Software used by the Crime Analysis Center Network <a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/21506935-raytheon-cacn-case-study#document/p2/a2091512" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">processes millions</a> of automatic license plate records a week.
As New York Focus has reported, the State Police — and likely crime analysis centers — have <a href="https://www.nysfocus.com/2023/01/13/state-police-social-media-surveillance-including-dataminr-shadowdragon-geofeedia/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">used powerful tools</a> that can monitor large swaths of social media and have been used to surveil Black Lives Matter protesters. Those aren’t touched by the legislative campaign.
Nor are the <a href="https://www.nysfocus.com/2022/11/23/new-york-state-police-phone-surveillance-cellebrite/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">powerful hacking tools</a> that the State Police has sought to purchase from the Israeli company Cellebrite, as New York Focus recently uncovered. Since that report, the State Police published yet another solicitation for phone-cracking products and services, this time from the Connecticut-based Teel Technologies.			<blockquote>
			Technology moves faster than law and politics. So we’re sort of catching up to what the technology can and cannot do.
		</blockquote>
				<h5>
			—Assemblymember Jessica González-Rojas		</h5>
		That more recent ask includes trainings for a <a href="http://www.studioag.pro/en/2011/10/le-flasher-box-per-lanalisi-forense-dei-cellulari/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">technique</a> to circumvent a phone’s security by forcing it to boot it into a more vulnerable state. According to Emma Weil, policy analyst at the technology research and advocacy organization Upturn and co-author of an <a href="https://www.upturn.org/static/reports/2020/mass-extraction/files/Upturn%20-%20Mass%20Extraction.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">expansive 2020 report</a> on law enforcement’s use of the technology, that suggests that the State Police are hoping to build up their in-house phone-cracking capacity — as opposed to having to engage outside experts or companies to conduct more complicated jobs. “And from our position, that’s not a good thing,” Weil said. “When these capabilities have a lower bar to access, they are more likely to be used against people in more situations.”
Police departments can only legally use the phone-cracking tech if they get a warrant or if the device’s owner consents to having their phone probed — though civil liberties advocates argue that so-called “consent searches” are far from consensual, since few realize just how powerful the technology is. It doesn’t help that New York’s search warrant statute was written more than 50 years ago, before the proliferation of modern computers, giving cops considerable leeway to interpret how the law applies to the tech.
But lawmakers see the recently announced legislative campaign as an important step in cutting down on the legal gray areas.
“Technology moves faster than law and politics,” said Assemblymember Jessica González-Rojas, who will introduce the legislation aimed at banning most government use of biometric data. “So we’re sort of catching up to what the technology can and cannot do.”
And they hope that their legislative push can pave the way for the rest of the country. “I want us to be proactive,” said Kristen Gonzalez, recently appointed head of the state Senate’s internet committee and sponsor of a forthcoming bill to modernize New York’s four-decade-old Personal Privacy Protection Law. “Yes, technology is rapidly changing and developing, but we can also think right now about what protections we’ll need in the future, and really set a strong foundation for our own data privacy and digital rights.”
The politics of police surveillance — a topic statehouses often ignore — are changing, the lawmakers say, as younger, more diverse, and, at least in New York, more left-leaning residents run for office. González-Rojas pointed out that most of the sponsors of the anti-surveillance campaign’s bills entered office in the last four years — “coming out of George Floyd, attacks against BLM, Trayvon Martin” — and from areas in New York City where the NYPD has aggressively surveilled Muslim and Black communities.
Despite funneling resources toward police surveillance, the governor hasn’t indicated where she stands on these changing debates. Asked about the legislative campaign, a spokesperson for her office only said that “Governor Hochul will review all legislation that passes both houses in the Legislature.”
The legislators haven’t been in contact with Hochul’s office, according to Hoylman-Sigal. But they are eager to engage the governor.
“I am excited to work with [Hochul] on defining what public safety means: safeguarding and protecting the data and personal information of our city and state,” said Gonzalez. 	 
<script src="https://nysfocus.com/pixel.js" id="republish" data-origin-url="https://nysfocus.com/2023/01/24/police-surveillance-boundaries-legislative-campaign"></script>