New Bill Would Block Utilities From Lobbying at Customers’ Expense

The legislation follows New York Focus reporting that showed a major gas utility may have been siphoning off customers’ bills to fund an anti-electrification campaign.

Colin Kinniburgh   ·   July 24, 2023
Assemblymember Michaelle Solages at a rally in Albany's State Capitol for the Build Public Renewables Act, with other supporters behind her.
Assemblymember Michaelle Solages at a rally in the State Capitol for the Build Public Renewables Act, March 23, 2023. | Courtesy of Sane Energy Project

Is your electric or gas company using your money to advance its political agenda?

It’s a question utilities have increasingly faced as energy bills have gone up and evidence has mounted that the companies have used those bills to pay for lobbying. And lawmakers have responded: In just the last two months, Colorado, Connecticut, and Maine have all passed legislation that would ban the practice.

Now it looks like New York could join them. A bill introduced Wednesday by Assemblymember Michaelle Solages of Nassau County would bar utilities from conducting political activity at their customers’ expense. That includes donating to candidates, funding trade associations, or lobbying — including what’s known as “grassroots” lobbying, when organizations enlist the wider public to press their cause to lawmakers.

“We need to ensure that utilities are using their funds solely to provide utilities — whether it’s gas, electric, or water — to the consumer, and nothing else,” Solages said. Given “the high prices of utilities, coupled with the climate crisis that we’re going to, we really need to ensure that we’re protecting the ratepayers.”

The bill comes after New York Focus revealed extensive lobbying efforts against electrification mandates by the gas utility National Fuel. The company robocalled its western New York customers in February, warning that a gas ban “could lead to power outages and cost increases” and patching them through to state lawmakers. And it used a ratepayer-funded website — officially intended to promote energy efficiency upgrades — to spread a similar message.

National Fuel has consistently denied that it has used customer funds to lobby, saying that shareholders were the ones who footed the bill. New York Focus’s reporting prompted the New York Public Service Commission to open an investigation into the matter in early March. But more than four months later, regulators have reported no progress.

The agency “continues to review the matter and, at this time, has no additional public information to share,” spokesperson James Denn said on Monday.

Watchdogs say utilities deserve greater scrutiny. Itai Vardi, research and communications manager at the utility watchdog group the Energy and Policy Institute, called Solages’s bill an important step.

“As captive consumers, ratepayers shouldn’t fund political machines — certainly not lobbying efforts that go against ratepayers’ interests,” he said.

Utilities are unique in that they are generally private, for-profit companies but are granted a legal monopoly to serve electricity, gas, or water in a given area. If someone moves into that area, they have little choice over who to buy their power from. In exchange for this monopoly, investor-owned utilities get an entire branch of state government — known as a public utility commission — devoted to regulating them.

Many states, including New York, already restrict utilities from using customer funds to lobby. New York public service law bars electric or gas companies from using ratepayer funds for “legislative lobbying,” and that prohibition was expanded in 2021 to include dues for trade associations. But critics say the law still contains loopholes: It doesn’t include lobbying on regulations by state agencies, for example, and there’s some ambiguity as to whether it covers “grassroots” lobbying like the robocall campaign.

“In our experience, if you don’t close the loopholes, then the utilities will exploit them,” Vardi said.

Solages’s bill explicitly bars grassroots lobbying and — like those passed in Colorado, Connecticut, and Maine — would require major utilities to submit annual reports to regulators on their political spending. It does not address lobbying around state regulations. Nor does it create any new penalties for companies that break the law, but Solages said state law already has provisions in place to fine utilities found guilty of wrongdoing.

New York Focus reached out to six of New York’s major electric and gas utilities for comment on the legislation, but they did not immediately respond.

The prospects of Solages’s bill remain uncertain. It does not yet have any cosponsors in the Assembly, and she said she is still seeking a lead sponsor to introduce a matching bill in the Senate.

“It’s in the infancy stages,” she said. But, given how the building electrification fight unfolded this spring, “I’m sure people are going to galvanize around this.”

I hope this article helped you better answer the question that guides all of our journalism: Who runs New York? Before you click away, please consider supporting our work and making more stories like this one possible.

New York state is standing at a crossroads for climate action. After passing one of the nation’s most ambitious climate laws in 2019, the state is lagging far behind on its targets, struggling to meet deadlines to build renewable energy and clean up its buildings and roads. Other states are closely watching our progress, making decisions about their own climate plans based on New York’s ability to implement this legislation.

As New York’s only statewide nonprofit news publication, we’ve been scrutinizing the state’s climate progress. Our journalism exists to unpack how power works in New York, analyze who’s really calling the shots, and reveal how obscure decisions shape ordinary New Yorkers’ lives.

But we can't do this work without your help. We rely on reader donations to help sustain our outlet, and every gift directly allows us to publish more pieces like this.

Our work has already shown what can happen when those with power know that someone is watching, with my reporting prompting a state investigation and fine for a major corporation. I have more story ideas than I can count, but only limited resources to pursue all the leads that come across my desk.

If you’re able, please consider supporting our journalism with a one-time or monthly gift. Even small donations make a big difference.

Thank you for reading.

Colin Kinniburgh
Climate and Environmental Politics Reporter
Colin Kinniburgh is a reporter at New York Focus, covering the state’s climate and environmental politics. He has worked in media for more than a decade, across print, television, audio, and online news, and participated in fellowship programs at CUNY’s Graduate School of Journalism… more
Also filed in New York State

Offshore wind is crucial to the state’s plans for cleaning up its electric grid, and construction is already behind schedule. The incoming president could slow it down a whole lot more.

Here’s a simple explanation of a complicated and archaic formula — and why the state is updating it.

Suozzi’s unreported financial interest in a promising healthcare startup highlights blurred lines between politics and profit.

Also filed in Climate and Environment

Some want New York to rethink its climate mandates. Could new gas plants be on the table?

Major new tech facilities are not expected to overload the state’s grid — but New York City could fall short of power in the early 2030s without creative solutions, according to a key study.

New rules from the Biden administration require water utilities to replace all lead pipes. That could cost New York $2.5 billion or more, kicking off a fight over who pays.