Brain Drain: Key Assembly Staff Positions Sit Vacant as Pay Stagnates

Much of Albany’s lawmaking process is controlled by a platoon of mostly young, low-paid employees who craft policy ideas into potential laws. And they’re turning over in droves.

Sam Mellins   ·   December 11, 2024
A black and white photo of the state Assembly chamber with yellow highlighting several empty seats.
The New York State Assembly Chamber. | Photo: Wadester16 / Flickr | Illustration: New York Focus

As negotiations over the state budget reach a fever pitch in March, a visitor to the New York State Assembly offices might see something surprising: cots and sleeping bags.

They’re evidence of a work culture that former Assembly employees say is punishing, all-consuming, and low-paying.

“My kids would call me crying and say, ‘When are we going to see you?’” one former Assembly staffer said. (New York Focus granted this staffer and others quoted in this story anonymity to avoid retaliation from their current employers.)

Staffers aren’t the only ones paying the price: The culture has contributed to a brain drain at the Assembly, where remarkably high turnover has shrunk staff ranks, slowed down Albany’s ability to legislate, and, in some cases, led to flawed bills and missed opportunities.

As lawmakers prepare to return to Albany in January to deal with topics like newly-arrived migrants and a deepening housing shortage, their work may be hampered by the unfilled positions and disorganization of a mostly invisible — but critical — cadre of staffers

It wouldn’t be the first time.

Photo of a cot and sleeping bag in a New York state Assembly office.
Sleeping arrangement in Assembly offices. | Obtained by New York Focus

Central Staff

They never make headlines and are barely known beyond the state Capitol, but much of Albany’s lawmaking process is controlled and managed not by the senators and assemblymembers that New Yorkers elect, but by “central staff” — a platoon of mostly young, low-paid employees who craft policy ideas into potential laws.

Bills often fail simply because they don’t get approval from these staff members, and unless a lawmaker collaborates closely with one of the staffers responsible for the bill’s subject area — such as health or agriculture — it may never reach the floor for a vote.

Hundreds of bills are left behind each year due to a lack of time to navigate this process within New York’s five-month legislative session.

And these central staffers are turning over in droves: The Assembly Office of Program and Counsel is the main central staff unit for analyzing proposed legislation, and about two-thirds of its employees have been there for under five years. Over 90 employees have left in that time span, and some have not been replaced. The size of the office has shrunk from nearly 90 down to 65.

Pay is a big factor, according to interviews with former employees: The average salary for program and council employees is about $71,000, a number that has actually decreased over the past five years, once inflation is factored in.

Meanwhile, the lawmakers over these staffers are doing just fine — having voted two years ago to raise their own pay by $32,000, bringing it to $144,000 a year.

Other government jobs are known to pay better. “Nobody’s gonna quit their job at the Department of Financial Services” to come work as an Assembly staffer, said a former Assembly lawyer who left for another government job, “because they’re just not paying them enough.”

One reason for the low pay: The Assembly’s budget to hire staff has also declined once inflation is accounted for, slipping to $76 million in 2024. This isn’t true of the Senate’s staff budget, slightly increased over the same time span to $82 million and affords staffers higher pay.

“My kids would call me crying and say, ‘When are we going to see you?’”

—Former Assembly Staffer

‘Problematic’

This brain drain has real effects. Because so many staffers are young with little work experience — let alone subject expertise — they may not have the knowledge necessary to improve bills.

One bill that may have fallen victim to this problem was an eco-friendly proposal to allow for more recycled wood to be used in construction. In a memo reviewed by New York Focus, a central staffer confessed that they “don’t know enough about the issue,” but said that it was “problematic” that the bill contradicted an international standard building code New York uses to regulate construction.

But New York isn’t bound to the international code, which has been frequently used as a baseline rather than the final word. The bill’s sponsors noted in a memo that Washington state, which also uses the same building code, recently adopted a similar regulation.

Still, the central staffer’s critique may have been enough to stop the bill, which passed the Senate but didn’t get a committee vote in the Assembly before the legislative session ended for the year. Assemblymember Anna Kelles, who sponsors the bill, declined to comment.

Lack of staff review and expertise can also hamper the effectiveness of bills that do pass, such as a technical omission imperiling a bill to help sexual assault survivors sue perpetrators, an editing error that helped keep people in jail past their supposed release dates, or a drafting error that dramatically limited the scope of a bill meant to make child care vouchers easier to use.

“Oftentimes, stuff would fall off just because you had no idea who was doing what, or there was no replacement for a staff member until the end of the year,” said a former Assembly staffer.

Missing Attorneys

Few staffers stay longer than five years, and the Assembly can struggle to find replacements. In fact, about half of the Assembly’s program and counsel employees have less than three years of experience.

According to a document obtained by New York Focus, 12 of the 39 Assembly committees or task forces were missing staff lawyers as of March, during the height of New York’s legislative session. Vacant positions included counsel for the housing committee, the health committee, and the social services committee. (Assembly lawyers generally staff multiple committees, so 12 open spots doesn’t mean the team is short 12 lawyers.)

Several committee chairs said that their work has likely been slowed as a result.

“If we had a counsel, would we do a speedier job? Probably,” said Assemblymember Amy Paulin, who added that the health committee she chairs — which is responsible for overseeing the state’s almost $100 billion Medicaid program — hasn’t had a staff lawyer since January 2023.

“If we had a counsel, would we do a speedier job? Probably.”

—Amy Paulin, New York State Assembly

Assemblymember Al Stirpe, who chairs the Economic Development Committee, also said his committee would probably get more done if it had a dedicated counsel, which it hasn’t had since at least January.

Assemblymember Phil Steck, chair of the committee that deals with alcohol and drug abuse, said that the lack of a staff counsel “does make it harder for us to have some of our bills move through committee.”

Other legislators said that vacant positions haven’t slowed down their work.

“It’s not affecting things, and I wasn’t aware of it until you mentioned it,” said Assemblymember Maritza Davila, who chairs the Social Services Committee, which had a vacant counsel position as of March. “I don’t know about these things. We’re not privy to that. Our role is to make sure that the committee runs smoothly,” she said.

Assemblymembers Rebecca Seawright, chair of the People with Disabilities Committee, and Andrew Hevesi, chair of the Children and Families Committee, expressed similar sentiments.

And though some lawmakers said that program and counsel staff are responsive to their concerns, some legislative staffers said it can be difficult to get their attention.

“One bill that I’ve been working on since November of last year I’ve had to explain to at least three different analysts because that many people have had the position in that time span,” said a former legislative director for an assemblymember. And every time, “we were back to square one,” they said.

Exhaustion and Culture

Workplace culture at the Assembly is yet another factor that has contributed to the recent exodus.

The demands of the job can be extreme: Several former staffers described work hours during the legislative session as being regulated by a policy known as “release,” which forbade employees from leaving the office each evening until given the greenlight by senior staff.

Even on more relaxed days during the legislative session, staff might not be released until 8 or 9 pm, a former analyst said. During more action-packed days, staying in the office until midnight or later wasn’t uncommon.

Some lawmakers who spoke with New York Focus sympathized with the staff.

“I feel terrible for them. I usually buy them some alcohol and some chocolate,” said Hevesi, the assemblymember. “But that’s just part of their job description — if you’re going to become a doctor, you know that your residency is going to be really tough.”

Few members of central staff have children. For those that do, balancing family and work can be an impossible task.

“I enjoyed the work,” said a former Assembly staffer. “I would have stayed, but I never got to see my kids. So I had to leave.”

Assemblymembers can get free childcare at a taxpayer-funded day care center in the state Capitol. Their employees, who make far less money, aren’t as lucky: They are directed to a daycare center (just steps away from the free center for assemblymembers) that costs between $250–$315 a week.

A former chief of staff to an assemblymember noted that the extreme intensity of work during the first half of the year could be mitigated by lengthening New York’s unusually short legislative session, which lasts just five months.

California’s legislature meets for eight months. Illinois and New Jersey are year round. But neither are a model New York’s leaders have shown any interest in emulating.

Assembly staffers said that the breakneck pace of the legislative session is balanced by a much more relaxed work environment in the summer, after legislators have gone home for the year. Employees can take time off to compensate for late-night hours during the budget crunch, and many take full advantage of this policy.

During summers, “I would just decide, ‘I’m not coming into work this week’,” one former Assembly attorney said.

Even during the more strenuous months, “we just had fun,” the attorney said. “At 9:00, we were just hanging out playing Cards Against Humanity or whatever,” while waiting to be released or for late night meetings to start.

Working in central staff generally shouldn’t be seen as a long term option, but rather as preparation for future government work, suggested Hevesi, the assemblymember.

“They take that expertise and the intense timeframe, and they turn it into careers after the Assembly,” he said.

“Maybe you pay your dues in the legislature, get to understand its workings, and then move on and go to a more normal schedule.”

That more normal schedule can be a big relief. A former legislative analyst recounted spending the entire night at the office, shortly before they left for another state agency.

“I woke up at 5:00 A.M. and the birds were chirping and I was like, ‘Thank God I get to go home and I never have to do this again,’” they said.

At New York Focus, our central mission is to help readers better understand how New York really works. If you think this article succeeded, please consider supporting our mission and making more stories like this one possible.

New York is an incongruous state. We’re home to fabulous wealth — if the state were a country, it would have the tenth largest economy in the world — but also the highest rate of wealth inequality. We’re among the most diverse – but also the most segregated. We passed the nation’s most ambitious climate law — but haven’t been meeting its deadlines and continue to subsidize industries hastening the climate crisis.

As New York’s only statewide nonprofit news publication, our journalism exists to help you make sense of these contradictions. Our work scrutinizes how power works in the state, unpacks who’s really calling the shots, and reveals how obscure decisions shape ordinary New Yorkers’ lives.

In the last two decades, the number of local news outlets in New York have been nearly slashed in half, allowing elected officials and powerful individuals to increasingly operate in the dark — with the average New Yorker none the wiser.

We’re on a mission to change that. Our work has already shown what can happen when those with power know that someone is watching, with stories that have prompted policy changes and spurred legislation. We have ambitious plans for the rest of the year and beyond, including tackling new beats and more hard-hitting stories — but we need your help to make them a reality.

If you’re able, please consider supporting our journalism with a one-time gift or a monthly gift. We can't do this work without you.

Thank you,

Akash Mehta
Editor-in-Chief
Sam Mellins is senior reporter at New York Focus, which he has been a part of since launch day. His reporting has also appeared in The San Francisco Chronicle, The Intercept, THE CITY, and The Nation. 
Also filed in New York State

New York Focus traveled across the state to meet with communities about their local news needs.

New York has a little-noticed tool to shift billions of highway dollars to climate-friendly public transit projects. The governor doesn’t seem interested.

New York’s home care workers are suing insurance companies for systematically underpaying them for grueling, around-the-clock work.