Canceling Your Cable Subscription in New York Won’t Get Easier This Year

The governor’s proposal could make it easier to cancel your gym subscription — but harder to cancel your phone or internet plan.

Sam Mellins   ·   February 10, 2025
Black and white photograph of someone's hands resting on a laptop keyboard, a photo of Kathy Hochul appears on the laptop screen. Around the border of the image, the logos of Verizon, Comcast, At&T, Disney Plus, Hulu, Apple TV, and Amazon Prime Video appear.
Governor Kathy Hochul's plan to make it “just as easy to cancel a subscription as it was to sign up” contains a loophole that would likely exempt many of the major companies that offer subscription services, including some internet providers and most major music and video streaming platforms. | Photo: Governor Kathy Hochul / Flickr; Burst / Pexels | Illustration: Leor Stylar

Subscription-based companies, from gyms to streaming services to cell phone networks, are infamous for making it fiendishly difficult to quit. Some force subscribers to send cancellations through snail mail or to wait on hold for hours. Others hide cancellation buttons on their websites.

As part of her affordability agenda, Governor Kathy Hochul promised to crack down on this behavior by making it “just as easy to cancel a subscription as it was to sign up.”

But her plan contains a loophole that would exempt many of the major companies that offer subscription services, including:

  • AT&T, Comcast, Spectrum, and Verizon;

  • all other providers of internet, TV, radio, and phone service; and

  • potentially most major music and video streaming platforms, like Amazon Prime Video, Amazon Music, Apple TV+, Apple Music, Audible, Disney+, Max, Hulu, YouTube Premium, and Peacock.

That’s because her proposed law wouldn’t apply to any company regulated by the Federal Communications Commission, or to those companies’ subsidiaries and affiliates.

The plan would also weaken existing regulations on those companies. State law currently gives consumers the right to an easy-to-use cancellation method, including online cancellations of any subscription that was made online. The new law would lift that requirement for the exempted companies.

It’s a “gaping exemption,” according to Erin Witte, director of consumer protection at the Consumer Federation of America.

“When you are exempting a pretty large swath of the industry that so famously traps people in subscription products and makes it difficult to cancel, it defeats the purpose of this legislation,” Witte said.

Ted Mermin, a consumer law expert at UC Berkeley, said the New York rule will still do “a lot of good.”

“There’s no reason any company in any industry should be able to trap someone in a subscription.”

—Samuel Levine, Former Director of the FTC's Bureau of Consumer Protection

“Yes, some industries managed to get themselves carved out, whether because of a state law regulating them would conflict with federal law or because they convinced the bill drafters it wasn’t worth the fight,” Mermin said. “But the bottom line for New Yorkers is that this bill will increase their bank balances and decrease their blood pressure.”

The law doesn’t define what counts as a subsidiary or affiliate. Courts may ultimately be the ones to decide whether it applies to companies like Amazon Prime Video or Disney+, whose parent companies are regulated by the FCC or own a company that is.

A related law governing automatic renewals also partially exempts those companies. Communications companies lobbied hard in 2020, when it was passed, and again in 2023 when it was strengthened. The effort to lean on lawmakers came from AT&T, TV provider DISH, tech insurer Asurion, and e-commerce giant Pitney Bowes, among others. The exemption wasn’t in the original version of the 2023 law, but was added in amendments.

Hochul’s bill this year would still cover subscription-based businesses like gyms, magazines, and apps, if they’re not related to any companies that are exempt from the law.

The fate of the bill — which Hochul included in her budget proposal — is unclear. It’s subject to legislative negotiation before the state budget deadline on April 1.

Senator Rachel May, who chairs the Consumer Protection Committee, said that “telecommunications and utility companies feel like they’re already regulated enough” and that Hochul’s proposed law “is for all of those other kinds of things that you get solicited to subscribe to,” such as the Ancestry.com genealogy website.

But even that might not be covered under Hochul’s proposed law. Ancestry.com is owned by asset management company Blackstone, which appears to partially own multiple FCC-regulated companies — potentially exempting Ancestry.com from Hochul’s plan.

“We’ll look into that and make sure that this law covers what it needs to cover,” May said.

Assemblymember Nily Rozic, who chairs the Assembly’s Committee on Consumer Affairs and Protection, declined to comment on the bill.

Hochul’s office did not respond to a request for comment.

Hochul’s proposal comes on the heels of a similar, but more ambitious, effort from President Joe Biden’s administration. Last year, the Federal Trade Commission, which is charged with consumer protection at a national level, passed a rule known as Click-to-Cancel that requires companies to provide a simple method for canceling any subscription.

Click-to-Cancel doesn’t have exceptions like the ones Hochul is pushing in New York. That was a deliberate choice, said Samuel Levine, who ran the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection during the Biden administration.

“Our rule was industry neutral, because we see problems across sectors with respect to trapping people in subscriptions,” he told New York Focus. “There’s no reason any company in any industry should be able to trap someone in a subscription and prevent them from canceling.”

The federal rule is slated to take effect in May, but it’s not clear whether President Donald Trump’s administration will enforce it. Both Republicans on the FTC’s five-member board last year voted against adopting it. One of those board members, Andrew Ferguson, is now the FTC chair. Several industry groups are also suing to block the rule entirely.

Leaving regulation up to the federal government “would presume regulatory vigilance at the federal level that simply can’t be presumed” under the current administration, said Norman Silber, a consumer law expert at Hofstra University’s law school.

Even if Click-to-Cancel survives, a powerful law specific to New York would offer an additional level of protection, noted Pat Garofalo, a state law expert at the think tank American Economic Liberties Project.

“Can you turn to the state attorney general to enforce the law, or are you fighting for the Federal Trade Commission’s attention along with everybody else in the country?” he said.

The loophole in Hochul’s proposal isn’t the only way the governor has disappointed consumer protection boosters this year. In 2024, she declared that one of her top legislative priorities was to strengthen New York’s law for preventing fraudulent business practices, which is among the weakest of its kind nationwide.

But the effort died in the face of stiff opposition from industry groups. Her agenda this year makes no mention of the issue — despite Lina Khan, Biden’s FTC head, urging Hochul to make another attempt.

Witte, of the Consumer Federation, said that abandoning the effort was a “real misstep.”

A strong rule governing automatic subscription renewals could help prevent situations like one recently faced by Silber, the Hofstra professor, who said he saw an $87 monthly charge appear on his credit card bill after a newspaper trial turned into an automatic subscription without warning.

“I had to fight to have that expunged from my bill, and I stopped my subscription,” he said. “But I teach consumer law, so I’m not going to sleep on that. Most consumers would not have the fortitude to keep going.”

At New York Focus, our central mission is to help readers better understand how New York really works. If you think this article succeeded, please consider supporting our mission and making more stories like this one possible.

New York is an incongruous state. We’re home to fabulous wealth — if the state were a country, it would have the tenth largest economy in the world — but also the highest rate of wealth inequality. We’re among the most diverse – but also the most segregated. We passed the nation’s most ambitious climate law — but haven’t been meeting its deadlines and continue to subsidize industries hastening the climate crisis.

As New York’s only statewide nonprofit news publication, our journalism exists to help you make sense of these contradictions. Our work scrutinizes how power works in the state, unpacks who’s really calling the shots, and reveals how obscure decisions shape ordinary New Yorkers’ lives.

In the last two decades, the number of local news outlets in New York have been nearly slashed in half, allowing elected officials and powerful individuals to increasingly operate in the dark — with the average New Yorker none the wiser.

We’re on a mission to change that. Our work has already shown what can happen when those with power know that someone is watching, with stories that have prompted policy changes and spurred legislation. We have ambitious plans for the rest of the year and beyond, including tackling new beats and more hard-hitting stories — but we need your help to make them a reality.

If you’re able, please consider supporting our journalism with a one-time gift or a monthly gift. We can't do this work without you.

Thank you,

Akash Mehta
Editor-in-Chief
Sam Mellins is senior reporter at New York Focus, which he has been a part of since launch day. His reporting has also appeared in The San Francisco Chronicle, The Intercept, THE CITY, and The Nation. Reach him on Signal: mellins.613
Also filed in New York State

“I really felt like the carpet was ripped out from underneath us,” said one county official. The state still hasn’t fully explained why it put HEAP on hold so suddenly.

New York has spent more on child care assistance in recent years, but high child care costs continue to drive families out of the state and into poverty.

The HEAP program abruptly closed to applications in January, months ahead of schedule. It has since reopened, but key questions remain about why it shut down so suddenly in the first place.

Also filed in Budget

Hochul says she has a plan to make New York affordable, through tax cuts and payments to families.

After years of targeting bail, the governor is proposing changes to New York’s 2019 discovery reform law.

Among her many health-related proposals, the governor wants to rein in drug prices — possibly by importing them from Canada.