How the New York State Budget Is Made

The budget is the state’s plan for how it will spend its money over the next year. It comprises thousands of pages of dense legal language spanning subjects from housing to transit. This year’s budget will likely allocate over $250 billion, with the biggest shares going to healthcare and education.

Despite its name, the budget isn’t limited to financial decisions; it’s also frequently used to enact laws that don’t involve spending money. Last year’s budget made it easier to crack down on toll and fare evaders, for example. Governor Kathy Hochul’s budget proposal this year targets the state’s 2019 discovery reform law, making it harder for judges to dismiss cases when prosecutors fail to share materials.

Most of the money spent in the budget comes from the taxes that New Yorkers pay to the state government. But a sizable portion is cash that the federal government gives New York to provide services ranging from highways and transit to health insurance for low-income residents.

Hochul’s proposal this year adds up to $252 billion. The Assembly’s is $257 billion . Once the dust settles and the negotiations are done, the final agreement will likely be somewhere between those two numbers. (The Senate hasn’t yet published an estimate for the cost of its proposal.)

Here’s the basic outline:

In the first few weeks of the year, the governor issues the “executive budget,” a comprehensive proposal for how the state should spend its funds.

A couple of months later, generally in early to mid-March, each house of the legislature responds with its own proposal, known as the “one-house budgets.”

The three parties enter into weeks of intense negotiations to resolve the differences. They’re supposed to come to an agreement by April 1, which is the start of the state’s fiscal year, but the process can drag on for days or even weeks past the deadline.

When the parties reach a deal, the legislature votes to approve the final budget, which goes to the governor to be signed into law. Everyone takes a deep breath and starts getting ready to do it again the next year.

Although the process is a three-way negotiation, the governor has the upper hand. The executive budget sets the framework for all subsequent discussion, and if legislators try to add additional spending items to the governor’s proposal, the governor can veto each item individually. That doesn’t generally happen, but the threat of a veto can enable the governor to rein in legislators’ desire to spend more.

When the Senate and Assembly issue their response budget proposals in March — also known as the “one-house” budgets — they’re more opening offers for negotiation than actual plans. No one expects that everything in the one-houses will be put into law. But once all three proposals are out, the subjects for debate are clear.

Three key parties dominate the process: the governor, the Senate majority leader, and the Assembly speaker. (They have historically been called the “three men in a room” — though two of them are now women.) Along with their senior advisors and staff, they conduct negotiations behind closed doors. Some key legislators also have significant sway, especially if they chair powerful committees or are longtime members who have built up influence over the years.

Most legislators play a limited role. Their main tools to advance their priorities are to pressure legislative leadership and to use public attention. Republicans generally aren’t included in negotiations. Democrats are kept more in the loop: Each house regularly holds “conferences” where legislative leaders and their staff share updates and get feedback from rank-and-file members as they work toward a deal.

New York’s budget process is notoriously opaque. In a 2015 analysis by the Center for Public Integrity, New York ranked dead last among all states for accountability and transparency in its budget process. Not much has changed since then, and good government groups still lament the lack of avenues for citizens to have meaningful input or even follow along.

Perhaps the most glaring example of the lack of transparency is how the legislature actually votes on the budget. The mammoth bills are often introduced just hours before the legislature approves them, offering almost no time for lawmakers — let alone the public — to process and react to the final agreements. Voting often doesn’t finish until the middle of the night, when few New Yorkers are watching.

This isn’t how things are supposed to work. Under the state constitution, bills must be introduced three days before a vote happens to leave time for public debate and scrutiny. But the governor can lift this requirement by issuing a “message of necessity,” allowing the bills to go to a vote immediately. These messages of necessity have become an Albany tradition, to the chagrin of good government watchdogs.

Although negotiations over the budget get fierce, not everything is up for debate. In fact, most of the negotiations revolve around just a few billion dollars out of the hundreds that the state will spend.

Significant parts of the budget are more or less on autopilot. State agencies, like the Department of Health or State University of New York, need to be funded every year at roughly the same levels. Medicaid and public education are always the two biggest line items, and don’t generally fluctuate dramatically in cost. Still, significant debate can occur even when it comes to required spending areas.

Beyond these required categories of spending, many items in the budget are “optional,” and can be slashed as a wide variety of programs compete for limited funds. Animal shelter funding might see a cut one year, or lawmakers might agree to fund a free bus program, among hundreds of options.