Why Did the MTA’s Union Turn Against Congestion Pricing?

Before Kathy Hochul paused it, the tolling program lost the little labor support it had when the Transport Workers Union withdrew its backing this spring.

Julia Rock   ·   July 26, 2024
A Long Island Rail Road conductor standing inside a train gestures with his hand.
The Transport Workers Union's shift on congestion pricing was part of a groundswell of union opposition this spring in the run-up to Governor Kathy Hochul’s decision to suspend the program. | Marc A. Hermann / MTA

When congestion pricing passed the state legislature in 2019 after a decade of political wrangling, it was buoyed by Transport Workers Union Local 100, which represents more than 41,000 New York City transit workers, including employees of the Metropolitan Transportation Authority.

The TWU brought its members to rallies in Albany in favor of the proposal, even sending them to crash an anti-congestion pricing event. It ran an ad proclaiming that “congestion pricing will generate billions of dollars for necessary improvements” and that “the system needs funding so transit workers have the equipment and infrastructure to provide the world-class service that New York needs, and riders deserve.”

The vocal support of TWU International President John Samuelsen was “critical” in passing the legislation, said Alex Matthiessen, an environmentalist who helped build the coalition that ultimately led to the bill’s passage under former Governor Andrew Cuomo.

“The unions cleared the way for Cuomo and the legislature to pass congestion pricing,” said Matthiessen. Most of them stayed out of the fight and “didn’t put their shoulder into it,” he said, but the TWU did.

Samuelsen was later appointed to represent New York City on the board that designed the program’s toll structure. In its final form, the policy was poised to fund $15 billion worth of MTA projects, including billions to fund MTA worker salaries and sustain thousands of TWU member jobs.

But five years after it passed, congestion pricing’s biggest labor supporter turned against it.

“This toll will whip blue collar, outer-borough workers,” Samuelsen told the New York Post in March. “It’s very classist.” Without a simultaneous expansion of public transit service to underserved areas, he said, the program’s $15 toll would place too large of a burden on commuters.

At a public hearing a few days earlier, TWU Local 100 President Richard Davis said that by charging transit workers to drive into the city, the MTA would be “milking the cow before it’s even fed.”

The TWU’s shift was part of a groundswell of union opposition this spring in the run-up to Governor Kathy Hochul’s decision to suspend the tolling program. The transit union leaders echoed arguments made earlier by municipal unions, including the United Federation of Teachers, much as Hochul would in her pause announcement in June.

The unions’ opposition was “very consequential” in fueling momentum against congestion pricing, said Kathy Wylde, president of the business group Partnership for New York City. Wylde served on the MTA’s Traffic Mobility Review Board, which designed the toll structure.

On July 11, one month after Hochul announced the pause, the TWU Local 100 made an $18,000 donation to the governor — the maximum allowed by law.

Yet the union is not pleased with the fallout from Hochul’s decision. Last week, the local joined New York City Public Advocate Jumaane Williams in suing the MTA; they alleged that the agency had reduced bus service earlier this month without notifying the city. The MTA made the cuts to save money, TWU officials claimed, because the pause was squeezing the agency’s operating budget.

The bus service cuts are on hold for now after a judge ordered the MTA to restore service. In response to questions about the lawsuit, an MTA spokesperson said, “Apparently, it’s now silly season.”

The $15 billion in revenue that congestion pricing was expected to deliver to the MTA could have paid big for transit workers. The amount is enough to fund about a third of the agency’s capital plan to make subway stations more accessible, repair and upgrade equipment, and modernize the signal system.

The MTA spends about 20 percent of its capital budget on wages and benefits for 7,300 of its workers; the rest typically goes to the outside construction workers, planners, and developers who help carry out the projects. If the same budget breakdown was used for congestion pricing revenue, more than $3 billion would have gone to MTA workers. (The agency pays most of its employees from the operating budget, which is largely funded by fares, tolls, and taxes, and would not have received a direct cash influx from congestion pricing.)

The planned upgrades would have also created an estimated 100,000 full-time jobs, according to an analysis from Reinvent Albany, a good government group — and a sizable chunk of them were likely to be filled with union labor because of prevailing wage laws.

“There wasn’t an effective argument or explanation as to why it’s important to make sure mass transit is funded properly.”

—J.P. Patafio, Transport Workers Union Local 100

But that didn’t convince labor groups. The MTA “is telling the outer-borough blue collar workers of New York City to shove it,” with the proposal, Samuelsen, the head of the TWU international, reiterated to New York Focus.

In January, New York City’s teachers union — which had largely remained silent throughout years of legislative deliberation — sued to block implementation of the program, partially because of its toll structure, which the union called unconstitutionally “regressive and discriminatory.” The Municipal Labor Committee, the umbrella organization for all of New York City’s public-employee unions, filed an amicus brief backing the teachers.

Hochul cited similar concerns when she announced the pause: “Let’s be real: A $15 charge may not seem like a lot to someone who has the means, but it can break the budget of a hard-working middle-class household.”

Car drivers on average earn more than transit riders, and only 11 percent of people who commute to Manhattan for work drive there. Transit advocates and lawmakers argue that Hochul’s appeals to affordability are a smokescreen for her political concerns about the program. (It’s been reported that her decision was in part motivated by this year’s election, in which suburban Democrats are facing strong Republican challengers.)

But that isn’t to say union members and other working people wouldn’t have been affected. According to a new analysis by the poverty research and advocacy group the Community Service Society of New York, provided exclusively to New York Focus, 42 percent of people who drive from the outer boroughs to work in Manhattan earn low or moderate incomes, meaning less than $60,240 for an individual.

Another new analysis, by the independent traffic modeling firm Replica, found that over 60 percent of all commuters who drive into the Central Business District earn more than $100,000 a year, Streetsblog reported.

Some union officials and members who favor the tolling program believe that Hochul and the MTA could have built labor support for congestion pricing by clearly conveying how many jobs the program would create and how it would improve public transit. On other hot-button issues like housing, they noted, Hochul has likewise made little effort to win union support for controversial proposals.

“I understand congestion pricing because I know the system needs funding,” said J.P. Patafio, one of seven vice presidents of the TWU Local 100 and a congestion pricing supporter. “But who really understands it that way? People thought, you give money to this big agency, and where is it going?”

“Union leadership, they need to respond to the members,” he said. “And there wasn’t an effective argument or explanation as to why it’s important to make sure mass transit is funded properly, both for our jobs and for the betterment of the city.”

The twu first began to shift on congestion pricing last winter, when Samuelsen pulled his support for the plan.

Before heading the international, which represents all of the union’s more than 100 locals, Samuelsen was president of Local 100, and a track worker before that. For over a decade during that time, he said, he attended congestion pricing advocacy meetings.

The program was to be modeled on similar downtown toll plans in Stockholm, London, and other cities abroad. After Cuomo signed on to the idea in 2017, Samuelsen had regular conversations with the governor about how “massive, London-style, up-front service investments” would be implemented alongside the tolling program, Samuelsen said. (When London implemented a congestion charge in 2003, it also added 300 buses to the city’s fleet, expanded bus lanes, increased frequency of service, and made other public transit improvements.)

In 2022, New York City Mayor Eric Adams appointed Samuelsen to the six-member Traffic Mobility Review Board, the entity tasked with creating a plan for who would be charged tolls and what the rates would be. The union leader resigned from the board last fall, blasting the MTA for failing to incorporate the service improvements he’d thought were necessary. He charged in his resignation letter that the MTA had “stubbornly and moronically stuck to its position that the status quo is adequate.”

“I have seen a change in attitudes among my coworkers. ... Recently, some people were saying that Hochul had made a mistake.”

—Gustavo Gordillo, IBEW Local 3

When he resigned, Samuelsen declined to endorse the board’s final proposal, which spelled out a tolling structure and included limited discounts for low-income drivers, reduced fares between 9 pm and 5 am, and limited exemptions, including for emergency vehicles.

An MTA spokesperson said, “Any assertions you may have heard that the MTA ‘failed to improve service before congestion pricing’ are far from the mark. The spokesperson noted that, in the past year and a half, the agency has increased weekend service and frequency on multiple train lines, increased express bus service, and is resdesigning each of the five boroughs’ bus networks.

“The legislature played a big role in pushing service improvements forward,” said Rachael Fauss, a senior policy advisor and MTA expert with Reinvent Albany. “The MTA always had the fairly neutral position of ‘If you give us the money, we will do it.’”

Last year, the state legislature did fund modest improvements to MTA service in the state budget. Senate Deputy Leader Michael Gianaris and Assemblymember Zohran Mamdani led the charge for a fare-free bus pilot program and $35 million for increased subway service at midday and on weekends.

“Could there have been stronger [service improvements] and more of them? Absolutely,” said Fauss. But after Covid caused ridership to plummet, the priority for the MTA was preventing service cuts, she noted.

According to Nick Sifuentes, who was executive director of the advocacy group Tri-State Transportation Campaign when congestion pricing passed, Adams and the city are partly to blame for meager service improvements. The MTA has plans to redesign the bus networks in the Bronx and Queens, for instance, but the plans have been “sitting on the shelf,” Sifuentes said.

“The city has not been great at rolling that out,” he said.

The Adams administration declined to comment. Adams has previously said, “We’ve done an amazing job of building bus lanes.”

Long Island Federation of Labor President John Durso, the traffic mobility board’s other labor representative, endorsed the board’s final proposal. In June, after Hochul’s announcement, Durso and three other board members wrote an op-ed in the New York Daily News encouraging the state to move forward with congestion pricing. (Durso declined to answer questions from New York Focus.)

Three days before Samuelsen publicly criticized congestion pricing in March, the Transport Workers Union’s New York City chapter came out against the plan.

“Before they even consider congestion pricing,” Davis, the local president, said at the time, “we need more transit service to persuade more New Yorkers to use the system.”

But there’s another motivation at work for the labor leaders. “Our members refuse to be taxed for simply coming to work,” Davis said.

Samuelsen agrees: “When [the MTA] starts charging transit workers a congestion pricing fee to come to work, to get their service out, all hell is going to break loose for them.”

“To me, it’s a lot of gobbledygook,” said Zachary Arcidiacono, who has worked as a train operator since 2007 and served as a local union official from 2013 to 2022, referring to Davis’s statement. “To me, it basically sounds like they want a carveout.”

The MTA had “stubbornly and moronically stuck to its position that the status quo is adequate.”

—John Samuelsen, TWU International president

When he was on the congestion pricing board, Samuelsen pushed for an exemption from the toll for MTA workers and other shift workers. (The final tolling plan did include a discount for shift workers, with a smaller toll between 9 pm and 5 am.)

“I get it,” added Arcidiacono. He noted that MTA workers didn’t get a railroad pass for the Long Island Railroad or Metro-North until 2014, even though the agency was incorporated in 1965. “But I think it’s a failure on the union’s part at this point. You’re looking at a handful of people who drive into the Central Business District versus $15 billion for transit.”

Around 5.5 percent of the TWU workforce commutes into the Central Business District, and many of those workers commute by public transit.

Numerous other groups, including judges, current and former cops, and health care workers, requested exemptions from the toll, but only a limited set of vehicles — such as emergency vehicles and school buses — ultimately received them. In its final proposal, the traffic mobility board noted that it had limited exemptions so that tolls would not have to be raised for remaining drivers, an effort to “consider the interests of the many over the few.”

Samuelsen did not dispute that the effects of pausing congestion pricing will be consequential for the MTA. “Hochul’s got a conundrum,” he said. “The greatest transportation system in the world could potentially fall into a state of disrepair and an epic failure of service delivery if she doesn’t find the funding.”

The union leader said he wasn’t concerned about this happening when he resigned from the congestion pricing board, though. “At the time, there wasn’t even a question to me about whether congestion pricing would go forward.”

Now, the effects of the pause are being felt even by those union members and officials who were skeptical of the tolling program.

Gustavo Gordillo, an electrician and IBEW Local 3 member, told New York Focus that many of his coworkers thought the toll was an unnecessary burden, even though they do electrical work on the transit system.

Since the pause, “I have seen a change in attitudes among my coworkers,” he said. “Recently, some people were saying that Hochul had made a mistake. I think that’s a result of a deeper public education from all of the media coverage” about canceled projects in the wake of the pause, he said.

Arcidiacono, the train operator, echoed that sentiment. “Even though a dollar spent today isn’t going into transit workers’ pockets the next day, long term it is!” he said. “You gotta look at it that way.”

Correction: A previous version of this story stated that congestion pricing would have funded $15 billion in MTA projects every year. In fact, that amount would have been funded overall. 

At New York Focus, our central mission is to help readers better understand how New York really works. If you think this article succeeded, please consider supporting our mission and making more stories like this one possible.

New York is an incongruous state. We’re home to fabulous wealth — if the state were a country, it would have the tenth largest economy in the world — but also the highest rate of wealth inequality. We’re among the most diverse – but also the most segregated. We passed the nation’s most ambitious climate law — but haven’t been meeting its deadlines and continue to subsidize industries hastening the climate crisis.

As New York’s only statewide nonprofit news publication, our journalism exists to help you make sense of these contradictions. Our work scrutinizes how power works in the state, unpacks who’s really calling the shots, and reveals how obscure decisions shape ordinary New Yorkers’ lives.

In the last two decades, the number of local news outlets in New York have been nearly slashed in half, allowing elected officials and powerful individuals to increasingly operate in the dark — with the average New Yorker none the wiser.

We’re on a mission to change that. Our work has already shown what can happen when those with power know that someone is watching, with stories that have prompted policy changes and spurred legislation. We have ambitious plans for the rest of the year and beyond, including tackling new beats and more hard-hitting stories — but we need your help to make them a reality.

If you’re able, please consider supporting our journalism with a one-time gift or a monthly gift. We can't do this work without you.

Thank you,

Akash Mehta
Editor-in-Chief
Julia Rock is a reporter for New York Focus. She was previously an investigative reporter at The Lever.
Also filed in New York State

Trump picked up some votes in New York this year. But Democrats lost far more.

Last month, we asked five questions about what would happen in the election. Here are the answers.

Some want New York to rethink its climate mandates. Could new gas plants be on the table?

Also filed in Transit

As the state’s plans to get New Yorkers out of their cars stall, Governor Hochul is championing a highway expansion in the Hudson Valley.

From New York City to Buffalo, people are driving a lot more than they did before the pandemic.

There are at least three ways a Trump administration could try to stop the transit-funding toll.

Also filed in Labor

Nearly half of the state’s child care providers have raised tuition and a third have lost staff, a new report found.

Medicare Advantage plans are spreading across upstate New York, despite a reputation for denying care. In Cortland County, retirees kept it at bay.

No state pursues workers for overpaid unemployment benefits as aggressively as New York. A proposed reform is colliding with New York’s own repayment problem.