Budget Allows Hochul to Spend $1.5 Billion Without Normal Review

Fiscal watchdog says independent oversight is needed to avoid waste and fraud.

Chris Bragg   ·   July 2, 2026
Governor Kathy Hochul stands and waves next to a bright blue swimming pool where a few children and adults are swimming.
Contracts exempted from oversight by lawmakers in the recently passed state budget include $40 million for Governor Kathy Hochul's "More Swimming Initiative." | Susan Watts / Office of Governor Kathy Hochul

Sign up for Staying Focused, our newsletter keeping readers up to speed on New York politics.

In the recently passed state budget, lawmakers quietly exempted nearly $1.5 billion from key oversight, allowing Governor Kathy Hochul’s administration to ink an array of future contracts without approval from the state’s fiscal watchdog.

An analysis conducted by the government reform group Reinvent Albany and shared exclusively with New York Focus found the exemption was applied to a wide range of taxpayer-funded programs, including $500,000 for a golf tournament; $40 million for projects to promote swimming; and $212 million to expand rural health care options through a program that includes expanding telehealth and addressing staffing challenges.

Comptroller Tom DiNapoli’s office normally exerts independent oversight over executive branch contracts. This approval process promotes fair competition in the bidding process, helps avoid wasteful spending, and saves taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars a year, according to DiNapoli’s office. But the executive branch has at times bristled at this added layer of bureaucracy that can delay projects, and the Hochul administration has chipped away at DiNapoli’s authority in recent years.

In a budget passed several years ago, for example, lawmakers explicitly exempted a contract to oversee a multibillion-dollar home care program from review by DiNapoli’s office. The transition has since allegedly led to turmoil in the home care program. Democratic lawmakers have expressed concern about the contract’s bidding process and at times have struggled to get answers about its details.

Before this year’s state budget was passed in May, DiNapoli’s office typically had the power to approve or reject executive branch contracts of over $50,000. In this year’s budget, Hochul’s office sought to raise that threshold to $300,000 for certain contracts. After negotiations with the legislature, the figure for some contracts was raised to $150,000.

The $1.5 billion identified by Reinvent Albany has largely escaped public notice. In these instances, the contracts ultimately funded through the budget appropriations will be exempted from comptroller approval, even if they exceed $150,000, according to Reinvent Albany. This exemption was often coupled with another allowing Hochul’s administration to skip the normally required competitive bidding process.

“This year’s final state budget included provisions that significantly reduce competition, independent oversight and transparency,” said DiNapoli spokesperson Jennifer Freeman.

A state Division of Budget spokesperson, Tim Ruffinen, called use of the exemption a “permissible legal process that has predated the current administration and can be used for a variety of reasons, including addressing emergency and time-sensitive situations.”

He declined to answer questions about why specific funding pots identified by Reinvent Albany required exemption. But he said DiNapoli’s office still has some power over these contracts.

Under the state constitution, the comptroller retains the authority to review and reject payments to a vendor for work performed under a state contract. DiNapoli’s office also has the right to conduct audits of all agency programs and spending. 

According to DiNapoli’s office, however, this does not make up for the powers stripped away. When it reviews a contract, the comptroller’s office examines factors including whether the selection process was conducted fairly; the reasonableness of cost; and whether the selected vendor’s history raises red flags.

“This year’s final state budget included provisions that significantly reduce competition, independent oversight and transparency.”

—Jennifer Freeman, spokesperson for Comptroller Tom DiNapoli

The comptroller’s office can only approve or reject payments to a vendor based on the terms of their existing contract, “no matter how imprudent” the terms may be, Freeman said. And DiNapoli has no power to approve the original contracts funded by this year’s $1.5 billion, according to the Reinvent Albany analysis.

New York Focus found that, at times, funds exempted from comptroller review have then gone unspent for lengthy periods, raising questions about whether a speedier process skipping normal oversight was truly necessary. Ruffinen did not address specific questions about those appropriations.

In true emergencies, DiNapoli’s office argues, state law already provides the executive branch means of working around the normal review process, such as through the issuance of executive orders. 

And according to DiNapoli’s office, its average approval process for state contracts last year took only about eight days. Nearly 90 percent were reviewed within 15 days, the office said.

Freeman, the DiNapoli spokesperson, told New York Focus that “history has shown the negative consequences when the State Comptroller’s office is cut out of the process and competition is eliminated.”

Early in his tenure, then-Governor Andrew Cuomo pushed through changes that exempted state university contracts from normal comptroller approval, allowing hundreds of millions of dollars to be spent on Cuomo’s signature “Buffalo Billion” economic development initiative without this oversight. These contracts ultimately became the centerpiece of a sprawling federal corruption case against the Cuomo administration concerning alleged bid-rigging. 

When Hochul came into office, “she actually reversed, initially, a lot of what Governor Cuomo had pioneered,” Alex Camarda, a senior policy advisor at Reinvent Albany, told New York Focus. “But then, in recent years, she’s started to do the same thing.”

The Reinvent Albany review found that in this year’s budget, at least $733 million in new budget appropriations had been exempted. In addition, lawmakers reapproved the spending of $745 million that had been exempted in prior budgets, but had so far gone unspent. The vast majority of the previously exempted funding stems from budgets passed since Hochul took office in 2021.

“Are they setting it up so that one vendor gets chosen and not another — or is it truly on the merits, and they’re just trying to speed up the work because it’s important to the state?” Camarda said.

The use of the exemptions in the current budget may go even further than $1.5 billion: According to Reinvent Albany, they could end up being applied far more widely. 

For instance, the budget also allows up to $100 million to be spent on a program aimed at greenhouse gas reduction — without comptroller approval or competitive bidding — if agencies receive permission from the state budget director to bypass these processes. According to Camarda, it’s unclear from budget documents what proportion of this pot of money, the Sustainable Future Program, will ultimately be exempted.

“Are they setting it up so that one vendor gets chosen and not another — or is it truly on the merits?”

—Alex Camarda, senior policy advisor at Reinvent Albany

Earlier this year, Hochul justified a rollback of state climate goals due to concerns about affordability. But Camarda said that through the exemptions, the governor was at the same time potentially “jacking up the cost for all these vendor contracts that are related to climate change.” The projects funded by the money include heat pumps for public schools and electric vehicle chargers. At least some of the contracts are being awarded through competitive bidding, records show.

Though Hochul’s administration says the exemption from review is needed to expedite certain contracts, the administration at times has failed to spend appropriations that have received it.  Lawmakers then approved even more money exempted from review, which has also gone unspent.

For instance, $60 million in funding for an initiative called the “Local Assistance Resource Program” was approved in the 2023 budget. Three years later, only $25 million has been spent from those funds.

The funding is earmarked for “services and expenses of local assistance projects, programs, and other purposes.” Besides being exempted from comptroller review, the contracts awarded through the funds were exempted from normal competitive bidding requirements.

Although much of the original money had gone unspent, the 2024 budget added $60 million more for the initiative — all of which also remains unspent – and the 2025 budget added another $30 million — also unspent. These allocations, too, were exempted from comptroller approval and competitive bidding.

At New York Focus, our central mission is to help readers better understand how New York really works. If you think this article succeeded, please consider supporting our mission and making more stories like this one possible.

New York is an incongruous state. We’re home to fabulous wealth — if the state were a country, it would have the tenth largest economy in the world — but also the highest rate of wealth inequality. We’re among the most diverse – but also the most segregated. We passed the nation’s most ambitious climate law — but haven’t been meeting its deadlines and continue to subsidize industries hastening the climate crisis.

As New York’s only statewide nonprofit news publication, our journalism exists to help you make sense of these contradictions. Our work scrutinizes how power works in the state, unpacks who’s really calling the shots, and reveals how obscure decisions shape ordinary New Yorkers’ lives.

In the last two decades, the number of local news outlets in New York has been nearly slashed in half, allowing elected officials and powerful individuals to increasingly operate in the dark — with the average New Yorker none the wiser.

We’re on a mission to change that. Our work has already shown what can happen when those with power know that someone is watching, with stories that have prompted policy changes and spurred legislation. We have ambitious plans for the rest of the year and beyond, including tackling new beats and more hard-hitting stories — but we need your help to make them a reality.

If you’re able, please consider supporting our journalism with a one-time gift or a monthly gift. We can't do this work without you.

Thank you,

Akash Mehta
Editor-in-Chief
A photo of Akash Mehta.
A photo of Chris Bragg.
Chris Bragg is the Albany bureau chief at New York Focus. He has done investigative reporting on New York government and politics since 2009, most recently at The Buffalo News and Albany Times Union.
Also filed in New York State

New York’s free air conditioner program ran out of funding before summer, even as extreme heat becomes a deadlier threat.

The deal could benefit 200,000 aides, and includes at least $25 million to compensate for wage deductions that New York Focus extensively reported on.

The Knights Inn, profiled by New York Focus and ProPublica last year, had received health and safety complaints for years.

Also filed in Budget

City budget gaps and an ambitious affordability agenda may require pressing Albany again for taxes and aid.

In May, state lawmakers passed a $269 billion budget after haggling for months over thousands of line items and policies affecting New Yorkers.

State leaders are expected to pass a bill that avoids resolving how much Resorts World New York City needs to pay.